Zoom

New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press

Name: New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press
Brand: University Press of Kansas
SKU: 9780700618033
Price: 27.99 USD
Availability: InStock

$27.99

Hurry Up! Only 145 Left in Stock!

Out of stock >

Guarantee safe & Secure checkout

Availability: In Stock

Contributors:

Kermit L. Hall, Melvin I. Urofsky

Publisher:

University Press of Kansas

Binding:

Paperback

Book Category:

Law, Political Science

Book Subcategory:

Legal History, Constitutional, Civil Rights

Series:

Landmark Law Cases & American Society

Shipping & Return +

The product is eligible for a complimentary return within 30 days from the date of purchase. Furthermore, individual items are shipped within 24 hours of receiving the order.

Rating and Reviews +

Specifications +

Release Date:

2011-09-06

ISBN 13:

9780700618033

Weight:

0.68 lbs

Size:

8.64 x 5.58 x 0.68 inches

Pages:

232

Mint Condition +

product description

Description

Illuminating a classic case from the turbulent civil rights era of the 1960s, two of America's foremost legal historians--Kermit Hall and Melvin Urofsky--provide a compact and highly readable updating of one of the most memorable decisions in the Supreme Court's canon.

When the New York Times published an advertisement that accused Alabama officials of willfully abusing civil rights activists, Montgomery police commissioner Lester Sullivan filed suit for defamation. Alabama courts, citing factual errors in the ad, ordered the Times to pay half a million dollars in damages. The Times appealed to the Supreme Court, which had previously deferred to the states on libel issues. The justices, recognizing that Alabama's application of libel law threatened both the nation's free press and equal rights for African Americans, unanimously sided with the Times.

As memorably recounted twenty years ago in Anthony Lewis's Make No Law, the 1964 decision profoundly altered defamation law, which the Court declared must not hinder debate on public issues even if it includes "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." The decision also introduced a new First Amendment test: a public official cannot recover damages for libel unless he proves that the statement was made with the knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false.

Hall and Urofsky, however, place a new emphasis on this iconic case. Whereas Lewis's book championed freedom of the press, the authors here provide a stronger focus on civil rights and southern legal culture. They convey to readers the urgency of the civil rights movement and the vitriolic anger it inspired in the Deep South. Their insights place this landmark case within a new and enlightening frame.

New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press

Description

Recently Viewed Products

Recently viewed products

Secure Payment

Online Offers

Quick Refunds

Curated Items