Sale 10% Off Your First Order
Russian Politics and Society
$48.99
Great Society: A New History
$17.99
Why I am a Hindu
$33.99
Introduction to Politics
$99.99
Anarchy
$6.97
The Long Game: A Memoir
$24.00
Socialistic Imperialism
$22.99
History of the Deep State
$29.99
NATO: Dangerous Dinosaur
$14.95
How to Defend Australia
$24.99
Fight Like a Mother
$17.99
We Can All Do Better
$19.99
- Login Account
- 0
- 0
-
0 Your Cart $0.00
Russian Politics and Society
$48.99
Great Society: A New History
$17.99
Why I am a Hindu
$33.99
Introduction to Politics
$99.99
Anarchy
$6.97
The Long Game: A Memoir
$24.00
Socialistic Imperialism
$22.99
History of the Deep State
$29.99
NATO: Dangerous Dinosaur
$14.95
How to Defend Australia
$24.99
Fight Like a Mother
$17.99
We Can All Do Better
$19.99
Sale 10% Off Your First Order
- Home
- Political - Books
- Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice
Description
Judges play a central role in the American legal system, but their behavior as decision-makers is not well understood, even among themselves. The system permits judges to be quite secretive (and most of them are), so indirect methods are required to make sense of their behavior. Here, a political scientist, an economist, and a judge work together to construct a unified theory of judicial decision-making. Using statistical methods to test hypotheses, they dispel the mystery of how judicial decisions in district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court are made.
The authors derive their hypotheses from a labor-market model, which allows them to consider judges as they would any other economic actors: as self-interested individuals motivated by both the pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects of their work. In the authors' view, this model describes judicial behavior better than either the traditional "legalist" theory, which sees judges as automatons who mechanically apply the law to the facts, or the current dominant theory in political science, which exaggerates the ideological component in judicial behavior. Ideology does figure into decision-making at all levels of the federal judiciary, the authors find, but its influence is not uniform. It diminishes as one moves down the judicial hierarchy from the Supreme Court to the courts of appeals to the district courts. As The Behavior of Federal Judges demonstrates, the good news is that ideology does not extinguish the influence of other components in judicial decision-making. Federal judges are not just robots or politicians in robes.About the Author
Lee Epstein is Provost Professor of Law and Political Science and Rader Family Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California.
William M. Landes is the Clifton R. Musser Professor Emeritus of Law and Economics at the University of Chicago Law School.
Richard A. Posner is Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.
Related Products
Recently viewed products
Shopping cart
close
-
WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR?Search
- Home
- Movies & TV
- Music
- Toys & Collectibles
- Video Games
- Books
- Electronics
- About us
- Castle Chronicles
- Contact us
- Login / Register